|
REVOLUTIONARY COMMON SENSE LIBRARY
Developmental
Age vs. Chronological
Age
Revolutionary
Common Sense by Kathie Snow
www.disabilityisnatural.com
The “developmental
(or functional) age” concept is a disability-world paradigm that should
make us halt in our tracks. Many children and adults with disabilities are
routinely graded against a “developmental scale.” If a person’s
abilities are substantially lower than the “norm,” he may be saddled
with a “developmental age.” His chronological age—his real
age—is dismissed as irrelevant. From then on, services, education, and
even the way he’s treated by family members may be based on his developmental
age. Yikes!
For example, if a 15-year-old has a developmental age of 10, he may be
treated like a 10-year-old, at home, in school, and in other environments.
This sets up low expectations, and his opportunities to be a 15-year-old
are limited or nonexistent! So is there any wonder why he may seem
like a 10-year-old? He’s simply doing what’s expected of him! This concept reinforces
the dangerous “not ready” mentality—a paradigm that actively
prevents people from living any semblance of a real life.
A developmental age generally applies to one narrow aspect of a person’s
life—like physical, emotional, intellectual, etc.—but it’s
often generalized to the whole person! This is patently unfair and can cause
great harm.
During my son’s kindergarten IEP (Individualized Educational Program)
meeting, the physical therapist shared her report with the IEP team. When she
read, “Benjamin functions at the level of an eight-month-old,” I
thought the kindergarten teacher was going to faint. I, on the other hand,
was horrified that my son was portrayed this way. Luckily, five-year-old Benjamin
was at the meeting, and his presence refuted this testimony! He was sitting
at a little table, “reading” a book out loud (one of many he had
memorized). When the kindergarten teacher heard the “eight-month-old” level,
she looked from the therapist to Benjamin and back again several times.
I realized the therapist was talking about his “gross motor” skills,
and interrupted her report to share this with the others at the meeting. Since
Benjamin had never crawled, his “development” (gross motor) was—and
would be forever, I suppose—“fixed” at the level of an infant.
If Benjamin had not been in attendance at that IEP meeting so that the teacher
could see who he really is, his opportunities for inclusion would have been
diminished. The teacher would have probably insisted that he not be in her
classroom that year. But his physical presence at the IEP meeting demonstrated
that he was definitely not like an eight-month-old!
While doing presentations around the country, I routinely meet parents
who have accepted the developmental age mentality. They’ll describe their
children by their disabilities, and include a statement like, “Brian
is eight, but he functions at the level of a four-year-old.” Egads! Who
made this ridiculous presumption? And why would anyone believe it—especially
the child’s own parent?
Treat
people as if they were what they ought to be and you help
them to become what they are capable of being.
Johann
von Goethe
|
|
Brian might have “tested” at the level of a four-year-old on one
type of assessment or another, but at age eight, he has double the life experience
of a four-year-old, so how in the world can we say he “functions” like
a four-year-old?
Let’s use our common sense here! Children who do not have disabilities
are all over the map in their development! A 10-year-old may read like a 13-year-old,
play soccer like a 16-year-old, and behave like an eight-year-old—and
he’s considered “normal!” Then there are adults without disabilities,
like myself: at the age of 56, I routinely vacillate between acting like a
10-, a 20-, and an 80-year-old. But no one ever puts a developmental or functional
age on me! Why, then, do we do this to people with disabilities?
We have mistakenly assumed that treating a person as if he were
his developmental age is a good thing. We may even believe, for
example, that (1) a child could not be successful if he was educated
in a classroom with others of the same chronological age or that
(2) an adult could not do a certain type of job because of his
developmental age. If you’re concerned about a person with a disability “not
being at age level,” look carefully at his environment and how he’s
treated. Perhaps he’s not “acting his age” because he’s
not being treated as the age he really is (and wants to
be)! Duh!
Routinely, young children (with and without disabilities) are
held back in kindergarten and the primary grades because it’s believed they’re “not
ready” for one reason or another. But many are recognizing the dangers
of this practice. Adults who were held back in school painfully reveal the
years of stigma attached to being older than their peers in school. It can
become a lifelong legacy of perceived failure that crushes a person’s
soul.
Furthermore, if we hold a six-year-old back in kindergarten
or a special ed preschool, how will being with children who
are a year or two years younger help him mature? That just
doesn’t make any sense! And why do we always “blame
the child”? Maybe the teacher didn’t do such a hot job! So why
would we compel the child to spend another year with her?
What can we do when someone isn’t at the same “functional level” as
her chronological age? In some cases, the answer is nothing! Again, children
and adults who do not have disabilities routinely exhibit a mismatch in their
chronological and developmental ages. The “cause” might be situational,
environmental, or something else. Sometimes we just need to give people space
and time to mature or learn. In other cases, we can provide accommodations,
supports, and/or assistive technology devices to help the person master his
environment and be who he really is.
When deciding to do nothing or something, let’s again use our common
sense. If a child, for example, is not quite as mature as his peers, so what?
Give him time, and ensure he has the opportunities
and experiences typical
for his chronological age. If he’s six, he needs to be surrounded by
other six-year-olds so he’ll learn how to be six. Keeping him with four-year-olds
will only encourage him to remain like a four.
If, however, a six-year-old is thought to be like a
two-year-old because he’s
not talking, he needs a communication device. If a student isn’t reading “at
grade level,” she needs modified reading materials and/or opportunities
to learn through methods other than reading.
If a teenager or young adult doesn’t “behave” at an “age-appropriate” level,
he needs to be with others of a similar age, in positive, supportive environments
where he can learn “how to be” that age. People around him need
to have high expectations for him, as well as patience. And he may also need
behavior supports.
Let’s dump the developmental (functional) age concept once and for all.
Isn’t it time to treat people with disabilities with the respect and
dignity they deserve for the number of years they’ve lived on this Earth?
©2006 Kathie
Snow, www.disabilityisnatural.com. Permission is granted for non-commercial
use of this article: you may print this web page and photocopy it to share
with others. Click
here to download the PDF handout version of the article.
As a courtesy, please tell me (kathie@disabilityisnatural.com)
how/when you use it. Do not violate copyright laws: request permission
before reprinting or republishing in newsletters, on websites, or in other
media
[A New Way of Thinking]
[The Disability is Natural Book and Video]
[About Us]
[People First Language]
[The Disability is Natural Store]
[Revolutionary Common Sense Articles]
[Presentations/Exhibits]
[Rave Reviews]
[Newsletter Library ]
[Contact Us]
[Home]
Disability is Natural
BraveHeart Press
Toll-free: 1-866-948-2222
1-719-687-0735
Fax: 1-719-687-8114
P. O. Box 7245
Woodland Park, CO 80863
Copyright © 2001 - 2008 by BraveHeart Press
Our words reflect the way we think, so let's get rid of descriptors like "handicapped, physically disabled, mentally retarded,
learning disabled" and other words that focus on the condition instead of the person. People First Language promotes dignity and respect for all!
Web search engine marketing by PageCafe Web Design and Marketing |