|
REVOLUTIONARY COMMON SENSE LIBRARY
The
Lost Art
of
Manners
Revolutionary
Common Sense by Kathie Snow
www.disabilityisnatural.com
What
are manners? Years ago, I read a meaningful definition (and, unfortunately,
cannot remember the source) which described manners as “making another person comfortable.” Most
of us probably try hard to have good manners, but it seems many of us lose
the art of manners when it comes to people with disabilities.
While I was presenting the “History of Disabilities” at Idaho
Partners in Policymaking, Howard (who is probably fifty- or sixty-something)
raised his hand and said he wanted to add something about how individuals
had been treated and talked about in the past, based on their disability
diagnoses.
“I have two brothers,” Howard began. “All the time I was
growing up, when my father introduced us, he said my brothers’ names
and then he always said, ‘And this is our retarded son, Howard.’ Why
did he do that, Kathie? It always made me feel so bad.” Then Howard broke
into shoulder-heaving sobs, as the years and years of pain poured out. Several
of us comforted him as best we could. Resuming my presentation, I noted that
years ago, many people probably believed that it was appropriate to share this
information with anyone (including strangers) and perhaps they also thought
people with disabilities did not have the cognitive abilities to understand
what was being said, so they didn’t think their words would hurt.
Howard’s pain was clear evidence that words—especially the words
used by parents and others who profess to care about you—hurt very deeply
and the pain is long-lasting. In Howard’s case, the pain was decades
old, but on that day, it felt just as raw as it did every single time Howard’s
father said, “My son is retarded.” It seems that things would have
changed over the past thirty, forty, or fifty years, but...
Week in and week out, I meet parents who talk about their children (regardless
of the child’s age) in the same way Howard’s father did! Sometimes
the child is present, sometimes not, when parents say things like:
—My daughter is autistic.
—He’s sixteen, but he functions like a 5-year-old.
—She doesn’t have much “upstairs.”
Would we share private information about family members who don’t have
disabilities? Would we ever say things like:
—My teenager still sleeps with a night light.
—My husband takes Viagra.
—My wife has a big boil on her behind.
I don’t think so! Most of us—I hope—have better manners than
to share personal information that is nobody’s business!
So how in the world can we, in all good conscience, share private information
about people who have disabilities? How can we talk about them, in front
of them, as if they’re not there? And talking about them when they are not
present isn’t much better—that’s a form of gossip, and the
person isn’t there to defend himself!
Family members aren’t the only guilty parties, however. Many professionals
have lost their manners, as well. After inviting me to present a seminar, several
different meeting planners have “helpfully” warned me, “Some
of our ‘consumers’ will be there, and they’re more like children.” Would
a coordinator make this announcement during the seminar, when adults with disabilities
are in the audience? Don’t think so. If a meeting planner feels it’s
appropriate to warn me about people with disabilities, why isn’t she
also motivated to warn me about others? As in, “Some of the parents and
professionals who are coming to the meeting are real duds.” Many educators,
especially those in non-inclusive schools, routinely use labels and negative
descriptors about their students, both in front of the students and behind
their backs. Ditto for many therapists who shamelessly call out, “The
Down’s is coming in this afternoon.”
The loss of manners isn’t limited to our words. Our actions speak volumes.
“Janelle” recently introduced me to her 20-year-old daughter, “Micki,” a
bright and lovely young lady who happens to have a disability. Micki shook
my hand and greeted me. In the course of casual conversation, I asked Micki
a couple of questions. She started to reply, but Janelle jumped in and answered!
Micki could speak for herself, but her mother got in the way! Why did Janelle
do this? Was she afraid I wouldn’t understand her daughter? Was she afraid
I would judge Micki by her words or oral abilities? Did she think her daughter
is incompetent? Or was she even aware she was doing this? I’m not sure.
Janelle probably spoke for her daughter when she was a very young child—like
all parents do—and perhaps she hasn’t realized Micki is grown up
and can speak for herself. I can’t imagine the frustration Micki must
feel—and the anger.
What’s frightening is that parents, professionals, educators, and service
providers are supposed to be “on the same side” as the children
and adults with disabilities they care about, serve, and/or teach. But with
friends like these, who needs enemies?
When we exhibit these poor manners, not only are we being downright rude,
but we risk causing long-term and severe emotional pain in others.
Furthermore, we reinforce the notion (and its accompanying prejudices)
that our society has two sets of rules: one for people without disabilities
and another set for people with disabilities. And we wonder why inclusion,
dignity, and respect for all people continue to be just out of our
reach. On a regular basis, our words and actions set people up for
exclusion.
How can we do better? First, using People First Language is crucial. (See
the People First Language article.) A person
is not her disability, thus, she is not “autistic”—she “has
autism.” A disability diagnosis simply represents a condition or
a characteristic; it does not define a person. And consider that a family
member of a person who has cancer does not say, “She’s cancerous.” So,
why do we say, “He’s disabled [or retarded, autistic, or whatever].”?
Saying, “She has cancer,” is more appropriate, as is, “He
has a disability.”
Second—and just as important—we need to be careful about sharing
information with others. Howard’s father might have shared that his son
was “retarded” in order to “explain” his son’s
behavior, speech, or something else. But the outcome of his good intention
was probably less than desirable: upon hearing “retarded,” people
most likely assumed the worst about Howard. (What terrible things we do to
people in our efforts to “do good!”) Once that first impression
was formed, there was probably very little Howard could do to change it. The
same is true today when we focus on a person’s disability as a “problem.”
There are relatively few times when it’s important to share a person’s
disability label with others: in special ed meetings, with medical personnel,
and/or with others in the service system. Just as we wouldn’t discuss
the need for Viagra or the details about the boil on your bottom with anyone
other than medical personnel, we do not need to share a person’s disability
diagnosis with anyone other than a few specific people in specific circumstances.
(And even then, there are more respectful ways of sharing information with
others, as described in “The Problem with ‘Problem’” article.
Let me know if you’d like a copy; contact info is below.)
Many people with disabilities are said to have “challenging behaviors.” Perhaps
we would do well to look at our own behavior before judging others. Is it possible
these individuals may be reacting or responding to the vicious, verbal assaults
they routinely experience when they hear others talking about them? Do we think
people don’t hear or understand what we’re saying? How arrogant
and uncaring can we be? Shouldn’t we care about how others feel? How
would you feel if others talked about you?
Third, we need to demonstrate our good manners by letting people with disabilities
speak for themselves and be themselves. They are our equals! We have no right
to speak for them, unless they have asked us to do so! To interrupt someone;
to “explain” his behavior or actions; or to “apologize” for
his drooling, his speech pattern, or anything else is to rob a person of his
right to be who he is! How would you feel if your husband interrupted you during
a meeting and said to others, “My wife is quite the motor-mouth, isn’t
she?”
The lives of people with disabilities should not be part of the public
domain. We have no right to speak for them, to reduce them to medical
diagnoses, to share their private information, to talk about them (in
front of them or behind their backs) in ways we would never talk about
ourselves, and, in the process, strip them of every ounce of dignity.
Have they ever given us permission to do any of these things?
Howard gave his permission to share his story. His experiences, as well
as the experiences of countless others, are continuing lessons that
help me stay on top of my manners. I hope they do the same for you.
©2004-06 Kathie
Snow, www.disabilityisnatural.com. Permission is granted for non-commercial
use of this article: you may print this web page and photocopy it to share
with others. Click
here to download the PDF handout version of the article.
As a courtesy, please tell me (kathie@disabilityisnatural.com)
how/when you use it. Do not violate copyright
laws: request permission before reprinting or republishing in newsletters,
on websites, or in other media. Clip art from Adobe In-Design.
[A New Way of Thinking]
[The Disability is Natural Book and Video]
[About Us]
[People First Language]
[The Disability is Natural Store]
[Revolutionary Common Sense Articles]
[Presentations/Exhibits]
[Rave Reviews]
[Newsletter Library ]
[Contact Us]
[Home]
Disability is Natural
BraveHeart Press
Toll-free: 1-866-948-2222
1-719-687-0735
Fax: 1-719-687-8114
P. O. Box 7245
Woodland Park, CO 80863
Copyright © 2001 - 2008 by BraveHeart Press
Our words reflect the way we think, so let's get rid of descriptors like "handicapped, physically disabled, mentally retarded,
learning disabled" and other words that focus on the condition instead of the person. People First Language promotes dignity and respect for all!
Web search engine marketing by PageCafe Web Design and Marketing |